 Rich Man, Poor Man, Beggar
Man, Thief: A Satirical Essay by Sam Aurelius Milam IIIPart 2: He Found A Crooked Sixpence
Beside a Crooked Stile
The
most obvious advantage to society of the Criminalized Recipients Iconoclastic
Manpower1
Exchange (CRIME) is one of cost. As Criminals,2
these individuals would represent a considerably smaller economic burden
to society than they do as welfare recipients, for two reasons. First,
although their per capita productivity and consumption would scarcely change,
they would be less numerous, since fewer people will voluntarily become
Criminals. This, however, is of relatively small importance when
compared to the second cost advantage of CRIME. This advantage is
that we would no longer need a large inefficient tax supported welfare
bureaucracy and we ALREADY HAVE a large inefficient tax supported
criminal bureaucracy. Thus no new costs to society would accrue to
offset the benefits achieved.3
This means that CRIME would provide a much needed boost to the economy.
The dollar resources previously earmarked for taxes to support the welfare
bureaucracy would instead remain in the hands of consumers, available for
the purchase of consumer products. The resulting consumer demand
would stimulate growth throughout the economy, particularly in the capital
investment necessary to meet such a groundswell of consumer purchasing.
The new economic vigor created by this growth would provide job opportunities
far beyond the needs of those individuals formerly filling the bloated
ranks of the welfare bureaucracy, as well as the hoards of welfare recipients
who didn't really need it, and easily offset the negative effects created
by the new Criminals, who after all, were incapable of doing much anyway.4
This
discussion, even with the aid of footnotes,5
has barely touched the surface of the cost benefits to society that would
result from CRIME; more complete treatments will no doubt be published.
Now, however, I must turn to another benefit of CRIME, a more profound
benefit. That is, the effect of CRIME on the relationship between
society at large and the law enforcement sector. Coming Soon: Part 3: He
Caught A Crooked Cat Who
Caught a Crooked Mouse
| 1 | | With
all due apologies to the ladies, if I said "personpower", the acronym would
be "CRIPE", and cripes, who wants CRIPE for an acronym!?! | | |
 | | 2 | | In
the current context, criminal activity is assumed to be restricted to the
various crimes of property acquisition, as opposed to the so-called "violent
crimes". This is a safe assumption, considering the abilities of
these particular criminals. | | |
 | | 3 | | The
singular opportunity to completely eliminate a bureaucracy without creating
several more to take its place is so unique as to be absolutely unprecedented.
It should be tried for the experimental value alone, even if no other reason
existed. | | |
 | | 4 | | It
can be argued that the criminal sector has a beneficial effect on the economy.
That is, theft provides goods to folks who might not otherwise have had
them, and when the stolen goods are replaced, the market has been expanded
by the amount stolen, increasing sales. If the victim isn't insured,
stupidity is its own reward. And if the victim is insured, then the
victim will be reimbursed, and the insurance company can justify a rate
increase. Everyone benefits. | | |
 | | 5 | | Thank
you. | | |
 |

 |